Essays, academic transcript and extracurriculars. These are only a few of the boxes students fill in on their college applications each year. But students are asked to check one box that cannot be curated: their race.

Should admissions officers consider a student’s race when deciding to admit them? California voters said no in 1996 and 2020. That question will now be answered nationwide in June.

The United States Supreme Court saw two cases on Oct. 30: Students for Fair Admissions v. University of North Carolina and Students for Fair Admissions v. Harvard. These cases both dealt with race-conscious admissions to universities, also known as “affirmative action.”

It is widely believed that the conservative majority on the Supreme Court will rule to severely limit the practice.

However, Palo Alto High School senior Johannah Seah said she worries that striking down affirmative action would increase inequity.

“My mom personally benefited from affirmative action as an immigrant, so I know that these policies are helpful and inclusive,” Seah said. “White Americans will always be privileged in education. By making it [college admissions] race blind, you’re taking away that nuance.”

According to Sally Chen, education equity program manager for the civil rights nonprofit Chinese for Affirmative Action, the origins of affirmative action were centered around reparations, not diversity.

“How do we account for the legacies of years and years of particularly Black people in this country being systemically excluded from opportunities?” Chen said.

But now, Chen said higher institutions use affirmative action toward a different goal.

“It [affirmative action] allows universities to consider race … alongside things like geography, religion, gender equality, for the purpose of having a diverse student body,” Chen said.

A lack of diversity in school can have an adverse effect on students, according to Castilleja sophomore Sophie Profit, who is of Mexican descent.

Profit said she has noticed a lack of representation of her ethnic community at her school.

“People who are underrepresented at my school sort of stick together and form smaller friend groups,” Profit said. “When you can’t identity with many people at your school it becomes really hard to fit in.”

Despite the impact diversity has on students’ education, measures to increase diversity have often been challenged. In a 2007 ruling, the Supreme Court found it unconstitutional for a Seattle school district to use race as a tiebreaker for admissions. 

And a case evaluating possible discrimination at Thomas Jefferson High School for Science and Technology, an elite Virginia high school that considered factors such as income and English-language proficiency when admitting students, is now making its way through federal court.

Starting in 1986 to reduce racial isolation, Palo Alto Unified School District’s Voluntary Transfer Program busses students in from the Ravenswood City School District in East Palo Alto.

While Chen said that it is unlikely that programs like Palo Alto’s will be directly affected by the Supreme Court’s decisions, she said she is concerned that people’s perceptions of the role of race in education will be changed.

“In the potential aftermath of a negative decision … I think talking about race could still be important to how you learn about who you are and the work you want to do,” Chen said. “That is still allowed and students shouldn’t feel like they need to hide parts of their identity.”